Having almost recovered from suggesting that 47% of American
voters were scroungers, Mitt Romney didn’t waste time retaining the nasty
mantle in America’s presidential election campaign. In a performance that most
felt won him the first election debate with Barack Obama, Romney said that he
would cut public funding to PBS, the broadcaster of Sesame Street. Romney made
clear that Sesame Street was exactly what he had in mind by saying, “I love Big
Bird… But I’m not going to keep on spending money on things to borrow money
from China to pay for.”
America has rushed to Big Bird’s defence. Obama joked that it
was time somebody got tough on Big Bird, a FiredBigBird Twitter account quickly
attracted 30,000 followers, and parents and children have uploaded videos of support
to YouTube. Romney’s plans to rein-in Big Bird go back almost a year, when he
told an audience that “Big Bird is going to have advertisements”, and he taps
into a general misconception amongst Americans that PBS claims huge quantities
of government money. In 2011 an opinion poll found 40 per cent of Americans
believed PBS accounted for between 1 and 5 per cent of government spending. The
actual figure is 0.0001 per cent, between 1 and 5 per cent of US government
spending would give public broadcasting about $300bn to play with.
No comments:
Post a Comment